The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of Leptolyngbya sp. BL0902 into a model organism for synthetic biological research in filamentous cyanobacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1409771 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hong Gao, Yali Wang, Ziling Huang, Feiqi Yu, Xi Hu, Degang Ning, Xudong Xu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2024.
All research outputs
#15,770,747
of 26,395,942 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#12,099
of 30,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,325
of 159,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#29
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,395,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.