The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unveiling metabolic pathways of selected plant-derived glycans by Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1414471 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rocio Sanchez-Gallardo, Francesca Bottacini, Lisa Friess, Maria Esteban-Torres, Clarissa Somers, Rebecca L. Moore, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, Paul D. Cotter, Douwe van Sinderen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 90% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,620,859
of 26,383,299 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,839
of 30,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,331
of 161,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.