The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The diel disconnect between cell growth and division in Aureococcus is interrupted by giant virus infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1426193 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander R. Truchon, Emily E. Chase, Ashton R. Stark, Steven W. Wilhelm |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 86% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2024.
All research outputs
#6,867,814
of 26,521,103 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,192
of 30,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,489
of 138,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,521,103 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.