The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Direct evidence of abortive lytic infection-mediated establishment of Epstein-Barr virus latency during B-cell infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1426311 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomoki Inagaki, Yoshitaka Sato, Jumpei Ito, Mitsuaki Takaki, Yusuke Okuno, Masahiro Yaguchi, H. M. Abdullah Al Masud, Takahiro Watanabe, Kei Sato, Shingo Iwami, Takayuki Murata, Hiroshi Kimura |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,817,939
of 26,099,501 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#18,143
of 30,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,597
of 201,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#172
of 429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,099,501 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.