The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus RNA using a closed loop-mediated isothermal amplification system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1429288 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natasha Edwards, Julien Reboud, Xiaoxiang Yan, Xin Guo, Jonathan M. Cooper, Jemma Wadsworth, Ryan Waters, Valerie Mioulet, Donald P. King, Andrew E. Shaw |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#17,578,475
of 26,565,554 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,998
of 30,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,440
of 237,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#60
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,565,554 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.