The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and evaluation of rapid and simple detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae using closed dumbbell-mediated isothermal amplification diagnostic assay
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1435010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yanli Zhang, Xuhan Chen, Guifang Ouyang, Jiaping Wang, Yongcheng Sun, Yanli Lai, Ping Zhang, Fei Guo, Shujun Yang, Rui Mao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,757,119
of 26,445,299 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#25,016
of 30,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,118
of 142,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#85
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.