↓ Skip to main content

Biochar, microbes, and biochar-microbe synergistic treatment of chlorinated hydrocarbons in groundwater: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biochar, microbes, and biochar-microbe synergistic treatment of chlorinated hydrocarbons in groundwater: a review
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1443682
Authors

Shixin Niu, Changsuo Li, Shuai Gao, Jingya Tian, Chao Zhang, Lixia Li, Yao Huang, Honghong Lyu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2024.
All research outputs
#23,675,590
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#24,966
of 30,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,682
of 139,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#52
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.