↓ Skip to main content

Computational approaches for inferring the functions of intrinsically disordered proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational approaches for inferring the functions of intrinsically disordered proteins
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mihaly Varadi, Wim Vranken, Mainak Guharoy, Peter Tompa

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are ubiquitously involved in cellular processes and often implicated in human pathological conditions. The critical biological roles of these proteins, despite not adopting a well-defined fold, encouraged structural biologists to revisit their views on the protein structure-function paradigm. Unfortunately, investigating the characteristics and describing the structural behavior of IDPs is far from trivial, and inferring the function(s) of a disordered protein region remains a major challenge. Computational methods have proven particularly relevant for studying IDPs: on the sequence level their dependence on distinct characteristics determined by the local amino acid context makes sequence-based prediction algorithms viable and reliable tools for large scale analyses, while on the structure level the in silico integration of fundamentally different experimental data types is essential to describe the behavior of a flexible protein chain. Here, we offer an overview of the latest developments and computational techniques that aim to uncover how protein function is connected to intrinsic disorder.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 93 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 29%
Chemistry 10 10%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 10 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,219,290
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#667
of 3,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,870
of 264,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,771 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.