↓ Skip to main content

A script to highlight hydrophobicity and charge on protein surfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A script to highlight hydrophobicity and charge on protein surfaces
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominique Hagemans, Ianthe A. E. M. van Belzen, Tania Morán Luengo, Stefan G. D. Rüdiger

Abstract

The composition of protein surfaces determines both affinity and specificity of protein-protein interactions. Matching of hydrophobic contacts and charged groups on both sites of the interface are crucial to ensure specificity. Here, we propose a highlighting scheme, YRB, which highlights both hydrophobicity and charge in protein structures. YRB highlighting visualizes hydrophobicity by highlighting all carbon atoms that are not bound to nitrogen and oxygen atoms. The charged oxygens of glutamate and aspartate are highlighted red and the charged nitrogens of arginine and lysine are highlighted blue. For a set of representative examples, we demonstrate that YRB highlighting intuitively visualizes segments on protein surfaces that contribute to specificity in protein-protein interfaces, including Hsp90/co-chaperone complexes, the SNARE complex and a transmembrane domain. We provide YRB highlighting in form of a script that runs using the software PyMOL.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 231 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 25%
Student > Master 29 12%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 57 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 90 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 17%
Chemistry 10 4%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 65 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,783,220
of 25,985,060 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#960
of 4,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,642
of 292,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,985,060 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,775 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.