↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Features Underlying Selectivity in Chicken Bitter Taste Receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Features Underlying Selectivity in Chicken Bitter Taste Receptors
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonella Di Pizio, Nitzan Shy, Maik Behrens, Wolfgang Meyerhof, Masha Y. Niv

Abstract

Chickens sense the bitter taste of structurally different molecules with merely three bitter taste receptors (Gallus gallustaste 2 receptors, ggTas2rs), representing a minimal case of bitter perception. Some bitter compounds like quinine, diphenidol and chlorpheniramine, activate all three ggTas2rs, while others selectively activate one or two of the receptors. We focus on bitter compounds with different selectivity profiles toward the three receptors, to shed light on the molecular recognition complexity in bitter taste. Using homology modeling and induced-fit docking simulations, we investigated the binding modes of ggTas2r agonists. Interestingly, promiscuous compounds are predicted to establish polar interactions with position 6.51 and hydrophobic interactions with positions 3.32 and 5.42 in all ggTas2rs; whereas certain residues are responsible for receptor selectivity. Lys3.29and Asn3.36are suggested as ggTas2r1-specificity-conferring residues; Gln6.55as ggTas2r2-specificity-conferring residue; Ser5.38and Gln7.42as ggTas2r7-specificity conferring residues. The selectivity profile of quinine analogs, quinidine, epiquinidine and ethylhydrocupreine, was then characterized by combining calcium-imaging experiments andin silicoapproaches. ggTas2r models were used to virtually screen BitterDB compounds. ~50% of compounds known to be bitter to human are likely to be bitter to chicken, with 25, 20, 37% predicted to be ggTas2r1, ggTas2r2, ggTas2r7 agonists, respectively. Predicted ggTas2rs agonists can be tested within vitroandin vivoexperiments, contributing to our understanding of bitter taste in chicken and, consequently, to the improvement of chicken feed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Unspecified 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Unspecified 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2018.
All research outputs
#18,584,192
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#1,986
of 3,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,740
of 440,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#26
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,871 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.