↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of a Single Decoupling Alchemical Approach for the Calculation of the Absolute Binding Free Energies of Protein-Peptide Complexes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of a Single Decoupling Alchemical Approach for the Calculation of the Absolute Binding Free Energies of Protein-Peptide Complexes
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise Kilburg, Emilio Gallicchio

Abstract

The computational modeling of peptide inhibitors to target protein-protein binding interfaces is growing in interest as these are often too large, too shallow, and too feature-less for conventional small molecule compounds. Here, we present a rare successful application of an alchemical binding free energy method for the calculation of converged absolute binding free energies of a series of protein-peptide complexes. Specifically, we report the binding free energies of a series of cyclic peptides derived from the LEDGF/p75 protein to the integrase receptor of the HIV1 virus. The simulations recapitulate the effect of mutations relative to the wild-type binding motif of LEDGF/p75, providing structural, energetic and dynamical interpretations of the observed trends. The equilibration and convergence of the calculations are carefully analyzed. Convergence is aided by the adoption of a single-decoupling alchemical approach with implicit solvation, which circumvents the convergence difficulties of conventional double-decoupling protocols. We hereby present the single-decoupling methodology and critically evaluate its advantages and limitations. We also discuss some of the challenges and potential pitfalls of binding free energy calculations for complex molecular systems which have generally limited their applicability to the quantitative study of protein-peptide binding equilibria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,000,417
of 26,526,336 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#1,020
of 4,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,019
of 352,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,526,336 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,859 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.