↓ Skip to main content

Simple Methods and Rational Design for Enhancing Aptamer Sensitivity and Specificity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simple Methods and Rational Design for Enhancing Aptamer Sensitivity and Specificity
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priya Kalra, Abhijeet Dhiman, William C. Cho, John G. Bruno, Tarun K. Sharma

Abstract

Aptamers are structured nucleic acid molecules that can bind to their targets with high affinity and specificity. However, conventional SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment) methods may not necessarily produce aptamers of desired affinity and specificity. Thus, to address these questions, this perspective is intended to suggest some approaches and tips along with novel selection methods to enhance evolution of aptamers. This perspective covers latest novel innovations as well as a broad range of well-established approaches to improve the individual binding parameters (aptamer affinity, avidity, specificity and/or selectivity) of aptamers during and/or post-SELEX. The advantages and limitations of individual aptamer selection methods and post-SELEX optimizations, along with rational approaches to overcome these limitations are elucidated in each case. Further the impact of chosen selection milieus, linker-systems, aptamer cocktails and detection modules utilized in conjunction with target-specific aptamers, on the overall assay performance are discussed in detail, each with its own advantages and limitations. The simple variations suggested are easily available for facile implementation during and/or post-SELEX to develop ultrasensitive and specific assays. Finally, success studies of established aptamer-based assays are discussed, highlighting how they utilized some of the suggested methodologies to develop commercially successful point-of-care diagnostic assays.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 282 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 20%
Researcher 42 15%
Student > Master 28 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 91 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 73 26%
Chemistry 37 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 7%
Engineering 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 106 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2021.
All research outputs
#17,952,510
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#1,711
of 3,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,785
of 326,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,888 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.