The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanistic Insight Into Cadmium- and Zinc-Induced Inactivation of the Candida albicans Pif1 Helicase
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmolb.2021.778647 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bo Zhang, Qintao Zhang, Xinting Zhu, Dayu Li, Xiaolei Duan, Jiao Jin, Kejia Wang, Yan Xie, Yang Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#18,649,291
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#2,004
of 3,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362,369
of 502,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#208
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.