The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive analysis to construct a novel immune-related prognostic panel in aging-related gastric cancer based on the lncRNA‒miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1163977 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cuncan Deng, Juzheng Peng, Cheng Yuan, Huafu Li, Wenchao Li, Hongwu Chu, Hongfa Wei, Yulong He, Leli Zeng, Mingyu Huo, Changhua Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#21,096,544
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#2,495
of 4,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,369
of 399,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#101
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.