↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Using multi-omics to develop new strategies to improve prognosis and immunotherapy outcomes in cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Using multi-omics to develop new strategies to improve prognosis and immunotherapy outcomes in cancers
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1190116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chenxi Cao, Shuang Chen, Libo Wang, Zaoqu Liu, Xinwei Han

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,243,571
of 26,083,840 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#2,520
of 4,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,886
of 392,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#95
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,083,840 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,780 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.