↓ Skip to main content

The IRAK-M death domain: a tale of three surfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The IRAK-M death domain: a tale of three surfaces
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1265455
Pubmed ID
Authors

Berke Gürkan, Hessel Poelman, Liza Pereverzeva, Danielle Kruijswijk, Alex F. de Vos, Anouk G. Groenen, Edgar E. Nollet, Kanin Wichapong, Esther Lutgens, Tom van der Poll, Jiangfeng Du, W. Joost Wiersinga, Gerry A. F. Nicolaes, Cornelis van ‘t Veer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,108,253
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#1,912
of 4,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,226
of 204,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#28
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.