The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From haystack to high precision: advanced sequencing methods to unraveling circulating tumor DNA mutations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1423470 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamires Ferreira da Silva, Juscelino Carvalho de Azevedo, Eliel Barbosa Teixeira, Samir Mansour Moraes Casseb, Fabiano Cordeiro Moreira, Paulo Pimentel de Assumpção, Sidney Emanuel Batista dos Santos, Danielle Queiroz Calcagno |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,532,301
of 26,429,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#2,589
of 4,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,032
of 133,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,429,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.