The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterizing cognitive aging of spatial and contextual memory in animal models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2012.00012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas C. Foster, R. A. DeFazio, Jennifer L. Bizon |
| Abstract |
Episodic memory, especially memory for contextual or spatial information, is particularly vulnerable to age-related decline in humans and animal models of aging. The continuing improvement of virtual environment technology for testing humans signifies that widely used procedures employed in the animal literature for examining spatial memory could be developed for examining age-related cognitive decline in humans. The current review examines cross species considerations for implementing these tasks and translating findings across different levels of analysis. The specificity of brain systems as well as gaps in linking human and animal laboratory models is discussed. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 36 | 25% |
| Psychology | 24 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,166,700
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,252
of 4,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,187
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.