↓ Skip to main content

Immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease: past, present and future

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease: past, present and future
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Spencer, Eliezer Masliah

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an incurable, progressive, neurodegenerative disorder affecting over 5 million people in the US alone. This neurological disorder is characterized by widespread neurodegeneration throughout the association cortex and limbic system caused by deposition of Aβ resulting in the formation of plaques and tau resulting in the formation of neurofibrillary tangles. Active immunization for Aβ showed promise in animal models of AD; however, the models were unable to predict the off-target immune effects in human patients. A few patients in the initial trial suffered cerebral meningoencephalitis. Recently, passive immunization has shown promise in the lab with less chance of off-target immune effects. Several trials have attempted using passive immunization for Aβ, but again, positive end points have been elusive. The next generation of immunotherapy for AD may involve the marriage of anti-Aβ antibodies with technology aimed at improving transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Receptor mediated transport of antibodies may increase CNS exposure and improve the therapeutic index in the clinic.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 22%
Neuroscience 20 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,588,147
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,903
of 4,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,045
of 229,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#14
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.