↓ Skip to main content

Electrical Stimulation Counteracts Muscle Decline in Seniors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrical Stimulation Counteracts Muscle Decline in Seniors
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helmut Kern, Laura Barberi, Stefan Löfler, Simona Sbardella, Samantha Burggraf, Hannah Fruhmann, Ugo Carraro, Simone Mosole, Nejc Sarabon, Michael Vogelauer, Winfried Mayr, Matthias Krenn, Jan Cvecka, Vanina Romanello, Laura Pietrangelo, Feliciano Protasi, Marco Sandri, Sandra Zampieri, Antonio Musaro

Abstract

The loss in muscle mass coupled with a decrease in specific force and shift in fiber composition are hallmarks of aging. Training and regular exercise attenuate the signs of sarcopenia. However, pathologic conditions limit the ability to perform physical exercise. We addressed whether electrical stimulation (ES) is an alternative intervention to improve muscle recovery and defined the molecular mechanism associated with improvement in muscle structure and function. We analyzed, at functional, structural, and molecular level, the effects of ES training on healthy seniors with normal life style, without routine sport activity. ES was able to improve muscle torque and functional performances of seniors and increased the size of fast muscle fibers. At molecular level, ES induced up-regulation of IGF-1 and modulation of MuRF-1, a muscle-specific atrophy-related gene. ES also induced up-regulation of relevant markers of differentiating satellite cells and of extracellular matrix remodeling, which might guarantee shape and mechanical forces of trained skeletal muscle as well as maintenance of satellite cell function, reducing fibrosis. Our data provide evidence that ES is a safe method to counteract muscle decline associated with aging.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 211 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 52 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 23%
Sports and Recreations 26 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 7%
Engineering 14 7%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 62 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,031,000
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,337
of 4,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,567
of 228,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#29
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.