↓ Skip to main content

Diffusion tensor imaging in Alzheimer's disease: insights into the limbic-diencephalic network and methodological considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diffusion tensor imaging in Alzheimer's disease: insights into the limbic-diencephalic network and methodological considerations
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julio Acosta-Cabronero, Peter J. Nestor

Abstract

Glucose hypometabolism and gray matter atrophy are well known consequences of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Studies using these measures have shown that the earliest clinical stages, in which memory impairment is a relatively isolated feature, are associated with degeneration in an apparently remote group of areas-mesial temporal lobe (MTL), diencephalic structures such as anterior thalamus and mammillary bodies, and posterior cingulate. These sites are thought to be strongly anatomically inter-connected via a limbic-diencephalic network. Diffusion tensor imaging or DTI-an imaging technique capable of probing white matter tissue microstructure-has recently confirmed degeneration of the white matter connections of the limbic-diencephalic network in AD by way of an unbiased analysis strategy known as tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). The present review contextualizes the relevance of these findings, in which the fornix is likely to play a fundamental role in linking MTL and diencephalon. An interesting by-product of this work has been in showing that alterations in diffusion behavior are complex in AD-while early studies tended to focus on fractional anisotropy, recent work has highlighted that this measure is not the most sensitive to early changes. Finally, this review will discuss in detail several technical aspects of DTI both in terms of image acquisition and TBSS analysis as both of these factors have important implications to ensure reliable observations are made that inform understanding of neurodegenerative diseases.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 24%
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 50 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 13%
Psychology 23 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 9%
Engineering 11 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 43 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,655
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,020
of 4,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,063
of 253,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#61
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.