↓ Skip to main content

How does aging affect the types of error made in a visual short-term memory ‘object-recall’ task?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How does aging affect the types of error made in a visual short-term memory ‘object-recall’ task?
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raju P. Sapkota, Ian van der Linde, Shahina Pardhan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 19%
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Other 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 40%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2024.
All research outputs
#18,327,349
of 26,794,105 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,400
of 5,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,182
of 364,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#26
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.