↓ Skip to main content

A Succinct Overview of Virtual Reality Technology Use in Alzheimer’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
443 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Succinct Overview of Virtual Reality Technology Use in Alzheimer’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebeca I. García-Betances, María Teresa Arredondo Waldmeyer, Giuseppe Fico, María Fernanda Cabrera-Umpiérrez

Abstract

We provide a brief review and appraisal of recent and current virtual reality (VR) technology for Alzheimer's disease (AD) applications. We categorize them according to their intended purpose (e.g., diagnosis, patient cognitive training, caregivers' education, etc.), focus feature (e.g., spatial impairment, memory deficit, etc.), methodology employed (e.g., tasks, games, etc.), immersion level, and passive or active interaction. Critical assessment indicates that most of them do not yet take full advantage of virtual environments with high levels of immersion and interaction. Many still rely on conventional 2D graphic displays to create non-immersive or semi-immersive VR scenarios. Important improvements are needed to make VR a better and more versatile assessment and training tool for AD. The use of the latest display technologies available, such as emerging head-mounted displays and 3D smart TV technologies, together with realistic multi-sensorial interaction devices, and neuro-physiological feedback capacity, are some of the most beneficial improvements this mini-review suggests. Additionally, it would be desirable that such VR applications for AD be easily and affordably transferable to in-home and nursing home environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 443 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 435 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 13%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Researcher 44 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Other 68 15%
Unknown 117 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 82 19%
Computer Science 43 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 8%
Neuroscience 33 7%
Other 78 18%
Unknown 134 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,412,309
of 25,962,638 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,547
of 5,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,453
of 280,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#26
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,962,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.