↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Brain training with non-action video games enhances aspects of cognition in older adults: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Brain training with non-action video games enhances aspects of cognition in older adults: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soledad Ballesteros, Antonio Prieto, Julia Mayas, Pilar Toril, Carmen Pita, Laura Ponce de León, José M. Reales, John Waterworth

Abstract

[This corrects the article on p. 277 in vol. 6, PMID: 25352805.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 35%
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 26%
Psychology 5 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 9%
Computer Science 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#13,436,543
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,952
of 4,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,789
of 266,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#51
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.