↓ Skip to main content

White Matter Microstructural Organization Is Higher with Age in Adult Superior Cerebellar Peduncles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
White Matter Microstructural Organization Is Higher with Age in Adult Superior Cerebellar Peduncles
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard A. Kanaan, Matthew Allin, Marco M. Picchioni, Sukhwinder S. Shergill, Philip K. McGuire

Abstract

Using diffusion tensor imaging, we conducted an exploratory investigation of the relationship between white matter tract microstructure and age in 200 healthy adult subjects using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). Though most tracts showed the slight decline in microstructural organization with age widely noted, in both superior cerebellar peduncles (SCP) it correlated positively with age, a result not previously reported. We confirmed this by using an alternative method, and by repeating our TBSS analysis in an additional sample of 133 healthy adults. In exploring this surprising result we considered the possibility that this might arise from the continual cognitive and motor refinement that is enacted in the cerebellum: we found that tract microstructure in both SCPs was also strongly correlated with IQ, again in contrast with all other tracts, and its relationship with age mediated by IQ, as a training model would predict.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 20%
Psychology 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Energy 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,451,892
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,059
of 4,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,037
of 300,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#74
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.