↓ Skip to main content

A Brain Region-Based Deep Medullary Veins Visual Score on Susceptibility Weighted Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Brain Region-Based Deep Medullary Veins Visual Score on Susceptibility Weighted Imaging
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruiting Zhang, Ying Zhou, Shenqiang Yan, Genlong Zhong, Chang Liu, Yerfan Jiaerken, Ruirui Song, Xinfeng Yu, Minming Zhang, Min Lou

Abstract

Cerebral venous collagenosis played a role in the pathogenesis of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) through venous ischemia. Since pathological changes of veins from intramural stenosis to luminal occlusion is a dynamic process, we aimed to create a deep medullary veins (DMVs) visual grade on susceptibility-weighted images (SWI) and explore the relationship of DMVs and WMHs based on venous drainage regions. We reviewed clinical, laboratory and imaging data from 268 consecutive WMHs patients and 20 controls. SWI images were used to observe characteristics of DMVs and a brain region-based DMVs visual score was given by two experienced neuroradiologists. Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images were used to calculate WMHs volume. Logistic-regression analysis and partial Pearson's correlation analysis were used to examine the association between the DMVs score and WMHs volume. We found that the DMVs score was significantly higher in WMHs patients than in controls (p < 0.001). Increased DMVs score was independently associated with higher WMHs volume after adjusting for total cholesterol level and number of lacunes (p < 0.001). Particularly, DMVs scores were correlated with regional PVHs volumes in the same brain region most. The newly proposed DMVs grading method allows the clinician to monitor the course of DMVs disruption. Our findings of cerebral venous insufficiency in WMHs patients may help to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms and progression of WMHs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Other 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,738,674
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,643
of 5,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,035
of 323,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#64
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.