↓ Skip to main content

Accumulation of 123I-Ioflupane Is a Useful Marker of the Efficacy of Selegiline Monotherapy in Drug-Naïve Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accumulation of 123I-Ioflupane Is a Useful Marker of the Efficacy of Selegiline Monotherapy in Drug-Naïve Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hidetomo Murakami, Tetsuhito Nohara, Masanobu Uchiyama, Yoshiyuki Owan, Akinori Futamura, Azusa Shiromaru, Setsuro Tsukada, Yu Saito, Takeshi Kuroda, Satoshi Yano, Seiichiro Ishigaki, Hirotaka Katoh, Jiro Munechika, Yoshimitsu Ohgiya, Takehiko Gokan, Kenjiro Ono

Abstract

Background: Selegiline enhances the patient's endogenous dopamine by inhibiting dopamine metabolism. The efficacy of selegiline monotherapy for drug-naïve Parkinson's disease (PD) patients may depend on the degree of dopaminergic neuronal degeneration. (123)I-Ioflupane single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and (123)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) myocardial scintigraphy are diagnostic methods to assess the pharmacological and pathological changes in PD. Objective: We examined the utility of these imaging methods to predict the efficacy of selegiline monotherapy for motor symptoms in drug-naïve PD patients. Methods: We observed the efficacy of selegiline monotherapy in 28 drug-naïve PD patients and compared the improvement in motor function and the imaging findings. These patients received selegiline monotherapy, and the amount was increased to the optimal dose in clinical practice. Motor function was assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Rating Scale (UPDRS) at baseline and at the stable dose. Imaging was performed before treatment, and the striatal Specific Binding Ratio (SBR) of the (123)I-Ioflupane SPECT and the Heart-to-Mediastinum (H/M) ratio of the (123)I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy were calculated. Both ratios were compared with improvements in scores for motor assessment using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: The mean UPDRS part III score significantly improved with at least 5.0 mg/day of selegiline. Further dose escalation did not improve the mean motor score. The percent improvement in the motor score from baseline showed a significant negative correlation with the SBR of average of the right and left striatum, but not with the H/M ratio. Multiple regression analysis using patient's background factors showed that percent improvement in the UPDRS part III score directly correlate with the SBR (p = 0.04), but not with the age (p = 0.72), disease duration (p = 0.31), baseline UPDRS part III (p = 0.77) and the drug dose (p = 0.26). Conclusion: PD patients with a lower accumulation of (123)I-Ioflupane in the striatum can have greater improvement with selegiline monotherapy.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Other 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Psychology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,573,839
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,084
of 4,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,018
of 321,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#72
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.