↓ Skip to main content

Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease: Activated, Dysfunctional or Degenerative

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease: Activated, Dysfunctional or Degenerative
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Navarro, Elisabeth Sanchez-Mejias, Sebastian Jimenez, Clara Muñoz-Castro, Raquel Sanchez-Varo, Jose C. Davila, Marisa Vizuete, Antonia Gutierrez, Javier Vitorica

Abstract

Microglial activation has been considered a crucial player in the pathological process of multiple human neurodegenerative diseases. In some of these pathologies, such as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis or Multiple Sclerosis, the immune system and microglial cells (as part of the cerebral immunity) play a central role. In other degenerative processes, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), the role of microglia is far to be elucidated. In this "mini-review" article, we briefly highlight our recent data comparing the microglial response between amyloidogenic transgenic models, such as APP/PS1 and AD patients. Since the AD pathology could display regional heterogeneity, we focus our work at the hippocampal formation. In APP based models a prominent microglial response is triggered around amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques. These strongly activated microglial cells could drive the AD pathology and, in consequence, could be implicated in the neurodegenerative process observed in models. On the contrary, the microglial response in human samples is, at least, partial or attenuated. This patent difference could simply reflect the lower and probably slower Aβ production observed in human hippocampal samples, in comparison with models, or could reflect the consequence of a chronic long-standing microglial activation. Beside this differential response, we also observed microglial degeneration in Braak V-VI individuals that, indeed, could compromise their normal role of surveying the brain environment and respond to the damage. This microglial degeneration, particularly relevant at the dentate gyrus, might be mediated by the accumulation of toxic soluble phospho-tau species. The consequences of this probably deficient immunological protection, observed in AD patients, are unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 353 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 18%
Student > Bachelor 61 17%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Master 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 88 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 79 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 107 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,081,634
of 23,057,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#227
of 4,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,789
of 325,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#10
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,057,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.