The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of Renal Dysfunction With Remote Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Lesions and Total Burden of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease in Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00171 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xu-hua Xu, Xiang-hua Ye, Jin-song Cai, Ting Gao, Guo-hua Zhao, Wen-ji Zhang, Lu-sha Tong, Feng Gao |
| Abstract |
Objective: Remote diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesions (R-DWIL) found in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients are considered as an additional marker of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). This study aimed to investigate the association of renal dysfunction and R-DWIL, as well as the total burden of cSVD on magnetic resonance imaging among patients with primary ICH. Methods: One hundred and twenty-six consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled. R-DWIL on DWI, as well as other imaging markers of cSVD, including lacunes, white matter lesions, cerebral microbleeds, and enlarged perivascular spaces were rated using validated scales. Renal dysfunction was evaluated either by reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or the presence of proteinuria or increased cystatin C. Results: After adjustments for potential confounders by logistic regression, impaired eGFR [odds ratio (OR) 6.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73-20.78], proteinuria (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.25-7.54) and increased cystatin C (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.11-6.72) were correlated with presence of R-DWIL. A similar association was also found between cystatin C levels (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.39-7.19), proteinuria (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.34-5.83) and the comprehensive cSVD burden. Conclusions: Renal dysfunction are associated with the presence of R-DWIL, and total burden of cSVD in patients with primary ICH. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 50% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,010,626
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,405
of 4,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,478
of 329,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#89
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.