↓ Skip to main content

Amyloid-β, Tau, and Cognition in Cognitively Normal Older Individuals: Examining the Necessity to Adjust for Biomarker Status in Normative Data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amyloid-β, Tau, and Cognition in Cognitively Normal Older Individuals: Examining the Necessity to Adjust for Biomarker Status in Normative Data
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Bos, Stephanie J. B. Vos, Willemijn J. Jansen, Rik Vandenberghe, Silvy Gabel, Ainara Estanga, Mirian Ecay-Torres, Jori Tomassen, Anouk den Braber, Alberto Lleó, Isabel Sala, Anders Wallin, Petronella Kettunen, José L. Molinuevo, Lorena Rami, Gaël Chetelat, Vincent de la Sayette, Magda Tsolaki, Yvonne Freund-Levi, Peter Johannsen, The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Gerald P. Novak, Inez Ramakers, Frans R. Verhey, Pieter Jelle Visser

Abstract

We investigated whether amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau affected cognition in cognitively normal (CN) individuals, and whether norms for neuropsychological tests based on biomarker-negative individuals would improve early detection of dementia. We included 907 CN individuals from 8 European cohorts and from the Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative. All individuals were aged above 40, had Aβ status and neuropsychological data available. Linear mixed models were used to assess the associations of Aβ and tau with five neuropsychological tests assessing memory (immediate and delayed recall of Auditory Verbal Learning Test, AVLT), verbal fluency (Verbal Fluency Test, VFT), attention and executive functioning (Trail Making Test, TMT, part A and B). All test except the VFT were associated with Aβ status and this influence was augmented by age. We found no influence of tau on any of the cognitive tests. For the AVLT Immediate and Delayed recall and the TMT part A and B, we calculated norms in individuals without Aβ pathology (Aβ- norms), which we validated in an independent memory-clinic cohort by comparing their predictive accuracy to published norms. For memory tests, the Aβ- norms rightfully identified an additional group of individuals at risk of dementia. For non-memory test we found no difference. We confirmed the relationship between Aβ and cognition in cognitively normal individuals. The Aβ- norms for memory tests in combination with published norms improve prognostic accuracy of dementia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 19%
Neuroscience 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Linguistics 2 3%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 24 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,032,553
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#599
of 4,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,673
of 328,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#25
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.