The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-Term Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Executive Function in Healthy Older Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00298 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lijuan Huo, Zhiwei Zheng, Jin Li, Wenyu Wan, Xiaoyu Cui, Shuyuan Chen, Wei Wang, Juan Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 39 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,652,743
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,103
of 4,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,841
of 348,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#120
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.