↓ Skip to main content

Inhibitory Control, Task/Rule Switching, and Cognitive Planning in Vascular Dementia: Are There Any Differences From Vascular Aging?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibitory Control, Task/Rule Switching, and Cognitive Planning in Vascular Dementia: Are There Any Differences From Vascular Aging?
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krystallia Pantsiou, Ourania Sfakianaki, Vasileios Papaliagkas, Dimitra Savvoulidou, Vassiliki Costa, Georgia Papantoniou, Despina Moraitou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 26%
Neuroscience 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,021,206
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,414
of 4,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,194
of 348,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#99
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.