The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Detection of Microbial 16S rRNA Gene in the Blood of Patients With Parkinson's Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yiwei Qian, Xiaodong Yang, Shaoqing Xu, Chunyan Wu, Nan Qin, Sheng-Di Chen, Qin Xiao |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,259,268
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,047
of 4,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,793
of 438,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#40
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.