The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Cognitive Profiles and Atrophy Ratings on MRI in Senior Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marianne M. Flak, Haakon R. Hol, Susanne S. Hernes, Linda Chang, Thomas Ernst, Andreas Engvig, Knut Jørgen Bjuland, Bengt-Ove Madsen, Elisabeth M. S. Lindland, Anne-Brita Knapskog, Ingun D. Ulstein, Trine E. E. Lona, Jon Skranes, Gro C. C. Løhaugen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 85% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,251,502
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,040
of 4,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,248
of 353,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#47
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.