The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taking Advantage of the Selectivity of Histone Deacetylases and Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors to Design Better Therapeutic Strategies to Treat Alzheimer’s Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mar Cuadrado-Tejedor, Marta Pérez-González, Cristina García-Muñoz, Damián Muruzabal, Carolina García-Barroso, Obdulia Rabal, Víctor Segura, Juan A. Sánchez-Arias, Julen Oyarzabal, Ana Garcia-Osta |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,258,766
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,759
of 4,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,729
of 352,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#47
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.