The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Free Water in White Matter Differentiates MCI and AD From Control Subjects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthieu Dumont, Maggie Roy, Pierre-Marc Jodoin, Felix C. Morency, Jean-Christophe Houde, Zhiyong Xie, Cici Bauer, Tarek A. Samad, Koene R. A. Van Dijk, James A. Goodman, Maxime Descoteaux, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 29 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 16% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2021.
All research outputs
#901,749
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#211
of 5,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,862
of 366,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#7
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.