The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Cognitive Training on Functional Connectivity of the Working Memory Network in Older Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole R. Nissim, Andrew O’Shea, Aprinda Indahlastari, Jessica N. Kraft, Olivia von Mering, Serkan Aksu, Eric Porges, Ronald Cohen, Adam J. Woods |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 28 | 21% |
| Psychology | 16 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 67 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,065,381
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,433
of 4,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,920
of 458,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#80
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.