The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Time for a Systems Biological Approach to Cognitive Aging?—A Critical Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deena Ebaid, Sheila G. Crewther |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 31% |
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 20 | 17% |
| Psychology | 15 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,317,060
of 25,027,753 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,595
of 5,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,920
of 390,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#51
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,027,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.