The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of an Innovative Cognitive Treatment and Telerehabilitation on Subjects With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2020.585988 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosa Manenti, Elena Gobbi, Francesca Baglio, Ambra Macis, Clarissa Ferrari, Ilaria Pagnoni, Federica Rossetto, Sonia Di Tella, Federica Alemanno, Vincenzo Cimino, Giuliano Binetti, Sandro Iannaccone, Placido Bramanti, Stefano F. Cappa, Maria Cotelli |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 17 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 73 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,459,813
of 24,224,854 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,626
of 5,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,927
of 382,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#88
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,224,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.