The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New Mechanistic Insights, Novel Treatment Paradigms, and Clinical Progress in Cerebrovascular Diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.623751 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Boltze, Jaroslaw A. Aronowski, Jerome Badaut, Marion S. Buckwalter, Mateo Caleo, Michael Chopp, Kunjan R. Dave, Nadine Didwischus, Rick M. Dijkhuizen, Thorsten R. Doeppner, Jens P. Dreier, Karim Fouad, Mathias Gelderblom, Karen Gertz, Dominika Golubczyk, Barbara A. Gregson, Edith Hamel, Daniel F. Hanley, Wolfgang Härtig, Friedhelm C. Hummel, Maulana Ikhsan, Miroslaw Janowski, Jukka Jolkkonen, Saravanan S. Karuppagounder, Richard F. Keep, Inga K. Koerte, Zaal Kokaia, Peiying Li, Fudong Liu, Ignacio Lizasoain, Peter Ludewig, Gerlinde A. S. Metz, Axel Montagne, Andre Obenaus, Alex Palumbo, Monica Pearl, Miguel Perez-Pinzon, Anna M. Planas, Nikolaus Plesnila, Ami P. Raval, Maria A. Rueger, Lauren H. Sansing, Farida Sohrabji, Charlotte J. Stagg, R. Anne Stetler, Ann M. Stowe, Dandan Sun, Akihiko Taguchi, Mickael Tanter, Sabine U. Vay, Raghu Vemuganti, Denis Vivien, Piotr Walczak, Jian Wang, Ye Xiong, Marietta Zille |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Kenya | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,499,809
of 24,333,504 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,645
of 5,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,830
of 514,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#97
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,333,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.