The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Working Memory Training in Amnestic and Non-amnestic Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Preliminary Findings From Genotype Variants on Training Effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.624253 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanne S. Hernes, Marianne M. Flak, Gro C. C. Løhaugen, Jon Skranes, Haakon R. Hol, Bengt-Ove Madsen, Anne-Brita Knapskog, Andreas Engvig, Are Pripp, Ingun Ulstein, Trine Lona, Xin Zhang, Linda Chang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 3 | 13% |
| Psychology | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2021.
All research outputs
#20,688,655
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,411
of 4,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#470,571
of 548,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#175
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 548,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.