You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Global Cognition in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.653340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zijun Xu, Wen Sun, Dexing Zhang, Vincent Chi-Ho Chung, Regina Wing-Shan Sit, Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,256,512
of 25,350,078 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,440
of 5,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,320
of 440,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#56
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,350,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.