The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Investigation of a Model-Based Working Memory Training With and Without Distractor Inhibition and Its Comparative Efficacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Healthy Old Adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.682474 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Priska Zuber, Emanuel Geiter, Dominique J.-F. de Quervain, Stefano Magon |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 24 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 7 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 26 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#13,384,756
of 23,925,854 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,939
of 5,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,812
of 433,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#126
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,925,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.