The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurofeedback and the Aging Brain: A Systematic Review of Training Protocols for Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.682683 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucas R. Trambaiolli, Raymundo Cassani, David M. A. Mehler, Tiago H. Falk |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 11 | 15% |
| Psychology | 9 | 12% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,010,041
of 24,157,645 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,122
of 5,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,134
of 435,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#86
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,157,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.