The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In-Person and Remote Workshops for People With Neurocognitive Disorders: Recommendations From a Delphi Panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.747804 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valeria Manera, Luis Agüera-Ortiz, Florence Askenazy, Bruno Dubois, Xavier Corveleyn, Liam Cross, Emma Febvre-Richards, Roxane Fabre, Nathalie Fernandez, Pierre Foulon, Auriane Gros, Cedric Gueyraud, Mikael Lebourhis, Patrick Malléa, Léa Martinez, Marie-Pierre Pancrazi, Magali Payne, Vincent Robert, Laurent Tamagno, Susanne Thümmler, Philippe Robert |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#16,383,217
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,940
of 5,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,590
of 504,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#199
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.