The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatments for depressive symptoms in cognitive impairment: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1037414 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Boru Jin, Yunting Xv, Bixuan Zhang, Lei Qiao, Huayan Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,781,817
of 26,495,046 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#918
of 5,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,029
of 499,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#33
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,495,046 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.