The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avoid or Embrace? Practice Effects in Alzheimer’s Disease Prevention Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2022.883131 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J. Aschenbrenner, Jason Hassenstab, Guoqiao Wang, Yan Li, Chengjie Xiong, Eric McDade, David B. Clifford, Stephen Salloway, Martin Farlow, Roy Yaari, Eden Y. J. Cheng, Karen C. Holdridge, Catherine J. Mummery, Colin L. Masters, Ging-Yuek Hsiung, Ghulam Surti, Gregory S. Day, Sandra Weintraub, Lawrence S. Honig, James E. Galvin, John M. Ringman, William S. Brooks, Nick C. Fox, Peter J. Snyder, Kazushi Suzuki, Hiroyuki Shimada, Susanne Gräber, Randall J. Bateman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 33% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 22% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,896,888
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,204
of 4,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,461
of 415,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#61
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.