The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of anoikis-related genes classification patterns and immune infiltration characterization in ischemic stroke based on machine learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1142163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaohong Qin, Shangfeng Yi, Jingtong Rong, Haoran Lu, Baowei Ji, Wenfei Zhang, Rui Ding, Liquan Wu, Zhibiao Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,889,670
of 23,515,785 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,468
of 4,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,531
of 284,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#117
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,785 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.