The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological findings for predicting of cognitive deterioration in memory clinic patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1155122 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kana Matsuda, Masaki Shinohara, Yuichiro Ii, Ken-ichi Tabei, Yukito Ueda, Naoko Nakamura, Yoshinori Hirata, Hidehiro Ishikawa, Hirofumi Matsuyama, Keita Matsuura, Masayuki Satoh, Masayuki Maeda, Ryo Momosaki, Hidekazu Tomimoto, Akihiro Shindo |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,572,243
of 24,329,306 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,209
of 5,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,545
of 244,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#24
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,329,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.