The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Constructing a prognostic risk model for Alzheimer’s disease based on ferroptosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1168840 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiao-Li Wang, Rui-Qing Zhai, Zhi-Ming Li, Hong-Qiu Li, Ya-Ting Lei, Fang-Fang Zhao, Xiao-Xiao Hao, Sheng-Yuan Wang, Yong-Hui Wu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
Psychology | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,409,940
of 23,798,792 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,127
of 5,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,797
of 302,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#45
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,798,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.